Sponsors Want Answers On Consequences Of Missing US FDA Trial Diversity Goals

No negative actions have been taken in the US FDA’s oncology review divisions, but vague diversity guidance continues to raise concerns.

diversity
Sponsors are hoping clinical trial diversity guidance updates will include more clarity on FDA actions when enrollment goals are missed. • Source: Shutterstock

Sponsors want more information about the potential consequences of failing to meet clinical trial diversity goals, but a US Food and Drug Administration official says worrying about penalties misses the point of the effort.

FDA officials have yet to take a negative action against a sponsor for missing diversity targets in an oncology clinical...

Pink Sheet Podcast

Learn what's happening at the US FDA. On the go.

Derrick Gingery and the team bring you a weekly "Drug Fix".

More from Diversity & Inclusion

Diversity Action Plans: What To Submit And When

 
• By 

With the deadline for comments on the US FDA’s draft guidance less than a month away, the Pink Sheet offers an infographic outlining what the agency is expecting in diversity action plans and when that might be implemented.

Clinical Trial Diversity Action Plans Need Timely FDA Feedback, Groups Say

 
• By 

The agency also should explain the potential consequences for sponsors if enrollment goals are not met, stakeholders say in comments on the DAP draft guidance. Some commenters urged the FDA to apply waiver criteria flexibly, especially for rare diseases.

Pharma Warming Up To Benefits Of Australia’s Teletrials Initiative

 
• By 

The Australian teletrials program has surpassed expectations at its mid-way point and is being used by drug and device sponsors looking to enhance trial participant recruitment and retention by enabling access to rural, regional and remote areas.

Pink Sheet Podcast: Clinical Trial Diversity, Off-Label Standard Of Care Issues, In-Person US FDA Adcomms

 

Pink Sheet reporter and editors discuss former Surgeon General Jerome Adams’ views on how the FDA can better ensure clinical trial diversity, questions about approving a new drug that would be used with a standard of care regimen that is off-label, and the agency beginning to schedule fully in-person advisory committee meetings.

More from Clinical Trials

Clinical Trial Diversity Action Plans Need Timely FDA Feedback, Groups Say

 
• By 

The agency also should explain the potential consequences for sponsors if enrollment goals are not met, stakeholders say in comments on the DAP draft guidance. Some commenters urged the FDA to apply waiver criteria flexibly, especially for rare diseases.

How To Decarbonize Pharma R&D

 

As the planet heats up and sea levels rise, the need to reduce carbon emissions is becoming ever more urgent. The life sciences industry is just one of many that are looking to cut the carbon it produces.

US FDA’s MIDD Program Could Expand Beyond Quarterly Requests, But Needs Resources

 

An FDA official said the agency is considering allowing MIDD meeting requests to be submitted more often, but must have a plan to deal with the likely increased demand.