Current accelerated approval provisions are the ‘sweet spot’ for balancing access and efficacy, but more attention needs to be paid by sponsors and the agency to working out regulatory pain points earlier in the development process, CBER director tells gene/cell therapy conference.
When it comes to making efficient use of the US Food and Drug Administration’s expedited regulatory pathways, more planning and work needs to happen earlier in the process rather than being an afterthought, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research director Peter Marks believes.
Speaking at the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy annual meeting on 17 May, Marks said the current accelerated...
In what could amount to a de facto enforcement mechanism, the new draft guidance also “strongly encourages” sponsors to share details about their diversity action plan and enrollment goals with the public.
Long-term follow-up requirements have taken a conservative approach but could be ripe for re-examination and global harmonization given the years of experience with the products, Kite Pharma executive director says; former FDA gene/cell therapy office head Wilson Bryan calls for elimination of the classwide REMS.
Program for collaborative reviews of gene therapy applications is getting under way with the European Medicines Agency. After launch, the pilot could be expanded to earlier discussions around CMC and pharm/tox data requirements, FDA’s Nicole Verdun said.
