FDA On What Aduhelm AdCom Got Wrong: Statistics, Investigational Drugs, Patient Perspective

 
• By Brenda Sandburg
  
Generate a summary of this article
Listen to this article
Beta

After a searing advisory committee on aducanumab, FDA reviewers undertook an extensive effort to counter or discount the panel’s criticisms, newly released review documents show. Among the unusual moves by the agency was the citation of data from two investigational products, Lilly’s donanemab and Biogen/Eisai’s BAN2401, as evidence in support of aducanumab.

Alzheimer's
FDA answers critics in review documents for Alzheimer's disease drug Aduhelm • Source: Alamy

The advisory committee review of aducanumab in November was a bruising affair for the US Food and Drug Administration, with a near unanimous vote against the drug and several pointed remarks directed to the agency by panelists about what they saw as an overly collegial relationship with the sponsor. FDA’s subsequent decision to grant accelerated approval of the Alzheimer’s drug suggested that the agency basically ignored the advisory committee, but newly released documents show that reviewers actually engaged in an extensive effort to downplay and dispute the panel’s conclusions. 

The committee erred in endorsing the findings of FDA’s statistical reviewers, failed to consider the similar treatment effects on clinical...

Pink Sheet Podcast

Learn what's happening at the US FDA. On the go.

Derrick Gingery and the team bring you a weekly "Drug Fix".

SpotifyApple PodcastsWebsite

More from Approval Standards

PS-Pathways&Standards (Free-1): Industrial Chemicals Within Us - The Ubiquity of Industrial Products in the Human Body

 
• By Nabil

Exploring How Everyday Industrial Compounds Enter Our Systems, Their Health Implications, and the Ongoing Quest for Safer Alternatives .

Diversity Action Plans: What To Submit And When

 
• By Nielsen Hobbs

With the deadline for comments on the US FDA’s draft guidance less than a month away, the Pink Sheet offers an infographic outlining what the agency is expecting in diversity action plans and when that might be implemented.

Clinical Trial Diversity Action Plans Need Timely FDA Feedback, Groups Say

 
• By Sue Sutter

The agency also should explain the potential consequences for sponsors if enrollment goals are not met, stakeholders say in comments on the DAP draft guidance. Some commenters urged the FDA to apply waiver criteria flexibly, especially for rare diseases.

Califf: Rare Disease Hub Will Develop Methods To Guide Approvability Determinations

 
• By Sarah Karlin-Smith

The US FDA commissioner also said the hub is looking for an executive director who will work with the CBER and CDER heads, who will serve as co-leads.

More from Pathways & Standards

Anvisa To Access US FDA-Reviewed Data For More Robust Evaluations In Brazil

 
• By Francesca Bruce

Brazil has also published its recent regulatory reliance regulations in English, a move designed to increase confidence in its decisions as it presses on with aligning its national practices with global best practices.

Califf: Rare Disease Hub Will Develop Methods To Guide Approvability Determinations

 
• By Sarah Karlin-Smith

The US FDA commissioner also said the hub is looking for an executive director who will work with the CBER and CDER heads, who will serve as co-leads.

Primary Biliary Cholangitis Drug Confirmatory Trials Aim To Avoid Hurdles That Tripped Up Ocaliva

 
• By Sue Sutter

The FDA and sponsors of two new accelerated approval drugs for PBC have taken steps in study design, initiation and reporting transparency to ensure timely completion; Intercept’s COBALT trial of obeticholic acid was negatively impacted by product safety labeling changes and a high crossover rate to commercial drug.