Final Guidance On Non-Inferiority Studies Lacks Industry-Sought Changes
• By Michael Cipriano
Generate a summary of this article
Listen to this article
One of industry's central concerns about the US FDA’s 2010 draft guidance was a "vaguely" and "subjectively" defined M2 clinical margin, but FDA did not provide a new definition in the finalized version.
Despite industry's concerns about a "vaguely" defined M2 clinical margin in a 2010 draft guidance on non-inferiority, FDA has stood pat in its wording.
Several major industry players, including the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, AstraZeneca PLCand Pfizer Inc. commented that...
Learn what's happening at the US FDA. On the go.
Derrick Gingery and the team bring you a weekly "Drug Fix".
A new research ethics review system for multi-site clinical trials in Canada is expected to help improve study start-up times, avoid unnecessary duplication and boost the country’s competitiveness on a global stage.
With the deadline for comments on the US FDA’s draft guidance less than a month away, the Pink Sheet offers an infographic outlining what the agency is expecting in diversity action plans and when that might be implemented.
Contract research organizations (CROs) in India must gear up to comply with new registration requirements coming into effect in April 2025 that aim to enhance the quality and integrity of clinical trials, as well as of any bioavailability and bioequivalence studies conducted by them.
With the deadline for comments on the US FDA’s draft guidance less than a month away, the Pink Sheet offers an infographic outlining what the agency is expecting in diversity action plans and when that might be implemented.
Contract research organizations (CROs) in India must gear up to comply with new registration requirements coming into effect in April 2025 that aim to enhance the quality and integrity of clinical trials, as well as of any bioavailability and bioequivalence studies conducted by them.
The agency also should explain the potential consequences for sponsors if enrollment goals are not met, stakeholders say in comments on the DAP draft guidance. Some commenters urged the FDA to apply waiver criteria flexibly, especially for rare diseases.