A variety of colorful metaphors have been deployed by GlaxoSmithKline in an attempt to minimize the potential wider impact of a controversial series of rulings over skinny-label generics in the US, with the originator insisting that decisions in its favor – as part of long-running litigation with Teva over its generic version of GSK’s Coreg (carvedilol) – do not equate to a “sea change in the law of induced infringement or a death knell for the ‘skinny’ label.”
“Teva is on the wrong side of history,” GSK declares in a response brief opposing Teva’s call for the US...






